As I was boarding a recent flight with my husband, I had a sudden pang…if something happened to us, was I sure that the beneficiaries we had designated to receive our assets were up-to-date? Were our assets titled correctly, and had anything changed since the last time we reviewed them?
Even financial advisors can have these nagging questions because things happen in life that can cause decisions we made in the past to change. Certainly, after any major life change, such as a marriage, divorce, birth of a child, or death of a spouse should cause you to review your beneficiary designations, but it’s a good practice to review them on a more regular basis too.
Many of us have spent years working and accumulating assets. Along the way, we have opened multiple bank, investment, and retirement accounts that have asked us to name beneficiaries directly for each account. Because these direct beneficiary designations supersede a Will, they need to be carefully reviewed and coordinated with an estate plan.
How your accounts are titled will determine whether or not they go through probate upon your death. Probate is neither good nor bad, but it’s not private and is an additional legal process that costs money and time when settling an estate and transferring property to your heirs. Once a Will is filed with the probate court, it becomes a public document, unless the court orders otherwise. Being cognizant of proper account titling allows you to avoid probate and transfer assets directly to your named beneficiaries since these assets will transfer outside of your Will.
Below is a quick recap of primary titling options and how assets will transfer upon death when titled in a particular way. Keep in mind that assets titled in the Individual Name with no designated beneficiary or Estate will transfer through probate. The other options will not.
Next, let’s review some of the top mistakes made with beneficiary designations:
By not naming a beneficiary, you already know your assets will go through probate, but in the case of a retirement plan or life insurance company holding your assets, there may be contract provisions that designate a “default” beneficiary which may be inconsistent with your intended wishes. In the case of a retirement account without a specific named beneficiary, there could be some avoidable tax consequences. See #2.
Distributions made to an Estate go through probate and are more limiting than if you had named a spouse or non-spousal beneficiary. In the case of an Estate, there are only two options for distributions:
Spousal and non-spousal beneficiaries also have these same two distribution options, but each has another more tax-advantageous alternative.
A spousal beneficiary may roll over retirement proceeds directly into their own IRA and take required minimum distributions based on their age not the decedent’s. In the case of a non-spousal beneficiary, he or she can establish an inherited IRA and withdraw an annual amount based on their life expectancy. These are called stretch IRAs and in many cases these beneficiaries have the ability to stretch out their retirement distributions—and taxes—over a longer time period.
The negative consequences are very clear – the person who gets your money may not be the intended beneficiary consistent with your last wishes. Your ex-spouse could inadvertently receive your assets if you fail to update your beneficiary to either your new spouse, children or others. If you specifically name each of your children as beneficiaries and forget to add the new addition to your family, they could be left out. If your primary beneficiary predeceases you, your contingent beneficiary will now be the recipient, so be sure to update both primary and contingent beneficiaries. And if your primary and contingent beneficiaries predecease you, then the same consequences will result as if you had not named a beneficiary at all. I think you get the picture—review and update your beneficiary designations often!
Regardless of any Trust provisions that you may have carefully created in your Will for your minor children, if you name a minor child as a direct beneficiary of your life insurance policy or other accounts, the assets will be paid outright to your child as soon as they reach the age of 18 or 21, depending on the state. Providing an 18-year-old with immediate access to a large sum of money may not be in his or her best interest. In this case, it would have been better to create a living or revocable trust as the beneficiary with provisions for minors who are beneficiaries of this trust.
A “special needs” individual is a person receiving government aid – now or in the future - for their disability. If you designate a “special needs” individual as a direct beneficiary, you could unintentionally disqualify that person from receiving these valuable government benefits. This individual must not only “spend down” their inheritance, but also go through the application process to re-qualify for benefits. It is advisable to work with an attorney who specializes in creating special needs or supplemental needs trusts to hold the inheritance of that individual, thereby not jeopardizing any potential government benefits.
It is not unusual for an aging parent to add a trusted adult child as the co-owner of their bank or investment account, especially if the child is paying the parent’s bills or managing their finances. Typically, the parent’s intent is not for that adult child to inherit the entire account upon the parent’s death at the exclusion of other children or even grandchildren. However, this ownership arrangement can create some potential issues such as:
Sometimes parents will designate a separate child as beneficiary for each of their accounts. Over time, the ending balances of these accounts can differ significantly with one child receiving much more than the other, which may not have been the parent’s intention upon their death.
Occasionally, a parent may even designate one particular adult child as the sole beneficiary of all accounts or a life insurance policy with the intent that this particular child will equally share the remaining balance with their siblings. Perhaps the parent felt this child was more financially responsible and would take better care of their inheritance for the benefit of all their siblings. Similar to the co-owner situation above, that named beneficiary child has no legal obligation to share any of these assets with his or her siblings. Furthermore, depending on the value of the inherited assets, they may encounter gift tax consequences which might have been avoided as part of a well-designed estate plan.
In the above, a preferred designation would be to title beneficiary designations “per stirpes,” which means equally among all of my children (and even includes an equal share for a deceased child’s children) to ensure that all children receive an equal share. To the extent a parent has concerns over a child’s financial responsibility, it may be best to create a specific trust to hold the inheritance for the benefit of that child while protecting assets from creditors.
Designating beneficiaries incorrectly, among other mistakes, can have far reaching negative consequences. Beneficiary designations are an important part of your overall estate plan and should be reviewed and updated as part of a well-coordinated estate plan with the help of an estate planning specialist.
Shawn: Now you hear all kinds of deals about leasing cars, how can you negotiate a better deal if you want to lease?
Nina: Okay, well many people don't realize that they can actually negotiate the sticker price on a leased car in the same way that you would do that if you're buying a car. And since when you lease -- when you're, you know, your lease payments basically cover the depreciation, the difference between the sales price and the residual value. So it's definitely in your best interest to try to reduce that sales price as much as possible because then you'll pay you know, smaller dollars over the life of the lease. Make sure you pay attention to the down payment at the lease signing. And so here's an example, you might see an ad that says you know, lease payment is only 1.99 a month and that sounds like a great deal for thirty six months. The catch is, is that it might require a $3,600 down payment. So, if you amortize the down payment, then actually that 1.99 special, becomes 2.99. So, you really have to kind of look at total costs.
And then lastly, dealerships use the term, money or lease factor, when they're calculating your financing costs and a lease factor is not the same as an interest rate. So, you have to make sure the dealer converts that lease factor into a comparable interest rate so you know what your financing charges are.
Shawn: At the end of the day, does one method wind up being more expensive more often than the other, or can we tell that?
Nina: You know what, it really depends on how long, if you're going to hold the car for a long time, you're better off buying. But if you know, and if you're not, if you just really enjoy driving and you want to have a new car, then go ahead and lease. I mean, there's pros and cons to both, to be honest with you, it's not one size fits all.
Shawn: Alright Nina, great. Happy Thanksgiving to you. Alright, Nina Mitchell is with The Colony Group, for more go to wtop.com and search Her Wealth.
Consider this your training manual to get and stay financially fit for life!