October 17, 2017

Uncovering The Risks of Investing Too Conservatively

Conservative investors should take a look at the actual risk in their investments. It may be more than they think.
Nina Mitchell, Principal, Senior Wealth Advisor & Co-President, Colony Sports & Entertainment

In my article, Risky Business: Misconceptions That Could Put Your Money at Risk, I talked about how risk is often misunderstood by investors. Whole classes of investments are often deemed “riskier” or “safer” and investing decisions are made based on these broad generalizations.

What’s rarely understood by those who believe their money is in safer investments—and for those who think they are avoiding risk by not being in the market at all—is that all investing, as well as sitting on the sidelines, involves some level of risk. Depending on current market factors and your specific financial situation, those risks may be higher than you think.

To put this into perspective, let’s take a closer look at a few misconceptions about being a “conservative” investor when it comes to your money.

Bonds are less risky than stocks, BUT….

While high quality bonds are far less volatile than stocks over the long run, there are still risks involved with investing in bonds. The idea that bonds may actually have negative performance may surprise investors as we enter a period of rising interest rates. Today, bond investors are faced with the double whammy of historically low yields and a Fed that may be increasing rates, albeit gradually.

Taking a quick look at recent history, bond investors have benefited from increased bond prices due to declining interest rates for over 35 years in what has been considered a very long secular bond “bull” market.  To put that in perspective, 10-year U.S. Treasury bond yields have steadily declined from an all-time high of 15.8% in September, 1981 to 6.6% in January, 2000 to 4.5% in October, 2007 to its current yield of 2.3% as of September 30, 2017.  Are we at the end of this bond bull market?

We know that bonds have an inverse relationship with interest rates; bond prices fall when interest rates rise because investors can buy new bonds that pay a higher coupon rate.  Rising interest rates can be very hard on investors who already own bonds or bond mutual funds, because they drive down the value of older bonds that pay less, potentially causing losses.

Be aware of the risks in your bond holdings:

If you own bonds, you need to know the duration risk—the bond’s price sensitivity or movement to a one percent change (up or down) in interest rates.  Long-term bonds have greater duration than short-term bonds. Think of duration as the length of time your bond will be affected by an interest rate change until its maturity. The higher a bond’s duration, the greater its price sensitivity to interest rate changes. A bond with only one coupon payment left until maturity will be underpaying the investor significantly less than a bond with ten coupon payments left. This difference in remaining coupon payments will cause a greater drop in a long-term bond’s price than it will in a short-term bond’s price when interest rates rise.

For example, a bond with a 5-year duration will decrease in price by 5% if interest rates rise one percent (and conversely, this same bond will increase in value by 5% if interest rates decrease by one percent).  You can find your bond fund’s duration by looking for it in the Fund Fact Sheet as part of the bond holding statistics. 

Risks of individual bonds, bond funds and type of bonds:

Investors who own individual bonds have more control over when (and whether) they want to sell a bond or hold it to maturity, but investors in bond funds do not have the same option.  As interest rates rise, bond fund managers may be forced to sell bonds at larger losses to meet higher redemption needs if investors bail out due to rising interest rate concerns.  Secondly, a sharp rise in interest rates could cause some bond fund managers to reposition their portfolio by selling older bonds at a loss as they look to replace them with newer bonds at higher yields.  These losses tend to catch many investors in bond funds by surprise 

Given the current low yields for high credit quality bonds, those investors searching for higher yields may be compelled to invest in lower quality, high yield (or junk) bonds or emerging market debt. If you go this direction, you have now added credit and currency risk to the interest rate risk of longer-term bonds. These types of bonds can pose greater risk and provide less diversification from your equity positions than bond investors may realize.  As a quick reminder, the S&P 500 decline of 38% for 2008 is well known, yet high-yield bond investors lost 26% and emerging market U.S. denominated debt lost 12% in that same year. 

Take a look at your bond holdings and make sure you fully understand the duration, credit quality and the type of bonds you own.  Clearly, not all bonds are “conservative” investments.  While high quality, shorter duration bonds may not offer much yield, they can play defense and add a measure of safety as one component in well-diversified portfolio.  

There is no risk if you are out of the market

It’s been nearly 10 years since the financial crisis of 2008 when the S&P 500 Index, widely considered the “U.S. market” dropped nearly 40%, causing investment portfolios, retirement accounts and even college funds to lose more than one-third of their value. Skittish investors sold out at the bottom to cut their losses and many never returned to the market. The problem is that they not only locked in their losses, but they also missed out on one of the longest market recoveries in history. From the market low of 677 on March 9, 2009, the S&P 500 has increased 272% as of September 30, 2017.

The risk of being out of the market due to fear or trying to time the market can lead to sub-par performance and have dire consequences for building long-term wealth that will sustain you in retirement.  Since retirement can easily last more than twenty-five years, retirees can no longer look at this stage in their life as a time to only preserve what they saved. Instead, they should look for ways to continuously grow their nest egg or face the real risk of outliving their savings.

For those super cautious investors who only invest in total safety such cash, CD’s and U.S. Treasuries currently earning just 0.5% to 2%, depending on maturity, the overriding risk is that your low return will not exceed inflation and inflation will erode your future purchasing power. In other words, your standard of living and what you can afford could easily be less in the future, especially with longer life spans.

The real cost of inflation:

For example, during the past 17 years, the price for electricity rose almost 3% per year from 2000 to 2017. A $100 monthly electricity bill then would cost you about $164 per month in 2017. Prices for food were almost 50% lower and medical care rose a whopping 3.56% per year.  So, if you spent $1,000 in medical costs in 2000, you would have paid $1,813 in 2017 for the same care.

According to the 2017 HealthView Services’ 2017 Retirement Health Care Costs Data Report, retiree health care expenses will rise at an average annual rate of 5.47% for the foreseeable future­—almost triple the U.S. inflation rate from 2012-16 and more than double annual projected Social Security cost-of-living adjustments.  The compounding impact of health care inflation means that health care costs will be one of the most significant expenses in retirement, especially for women.

Being too conservative in your investments means that you will miss out on compounding and the ability to grow your money over the long term.  Based on time value of money tools, it’s easy to compare saving at 2% versus investing at 6%.  If you invested $1,000 per month for 30 years or $360,000, the ending value of that portfolio in 30 years would be $487,000 at 2% versus $949,000 at 6%. 

Marketing timing doesn’t work:

This chart shows why it’s smart to remain invested for the long term and accept market volatility as a normal part of investing. Despite average intra-year drops of 14.1%, the S&P 500 Index has had positive annual returns in 28 of 37 years or 75% of the time from 1980 through September 30, 2017.  If you try to market time, you could easily miss the best days of the market. 

Simply put, an investor who stayed fully invested in the S&P 500 from Jan 1, 1997 through Dec 31, 2016 had an average return of 7.7% despite two major market downturns. Had you tried to time the market and missed the 20 best days in the market, your average annualized return for the same 20 years would have been 1.6%. Worse, if you missed the 40 best days during this same time period, your return would have been -2.4%.

Once you consider the impact of inflation and taxes, you may actually be earning a negative real rate of return if you are sitting on the sidelines from the stock market or too conservatively invested. Not only will your savings lose value over time, but there’s a chance you could outlive your retirement savings. 

Many investors don’t have a good understanding of risk, and too often associate risk solely with volatility. By avoiding investments deemed more risky, they miss the point and potential opportunities like buying assets at a discount or selling them at a premium. My colleague, Jake Weinreb, wrote an insightful piece—Rethinking Investment Risk—that provides an excellent explanation of risk and its role in investing.

We should not treat risk like a 4-letter word (even though it technically is). It’s a necessary component of investing that can work to your advantage if managed correctly. The best defense against taking too much or too little risk in your investing is to have a well thought out plan and a well-diversified portfolio. You’re much more likely to reach your financial goals (and enjoy your golden years) by taking this approach.

Tweet

Shawn: Now you hear all kinds of deals about leasing cars, how can you negotiate a better deal if you want to lease?

Nina: Okay, well many people don't realize that they can actually negotiate the sticker price on a leased car in the same way that you would do that if you're buying a car. And since when you lease -- when you're, you know, your lease payments basically cover the depreciation, the difference between the sales price and the residual value. So it's definitely in your best interest to try to reduce that sales price as much as possible because then you'll pay you know, smaller dollars over the life of the lease. Make sure you pay attention to the down payment at the lease signing. And so here's an example, you might see an ad that says you know, lease payment is only 1.99 a month and that sounds like a great deal for thirty six months. The catch is, is that it might require a $3,600 down payment. So, if you amortize the down payment, then actually that 1.99 special, becomes 2.99. So, you really have to kind of look at total costs. 

And then lastly, dealerships use the term, money or lease factor, when they're calculating your financing costs and a lease factor is not the same as an interest rate. So, you have to make sure the dealer converts that lease factor into a comparable interest rate so you know what your financing charges are. 

Shawn: At the end of the day, does one method wind up being more expensive more often than the other, or can we tell that?

Nina: You know what, it really depends on how long, if you're going to hold the car for a long time, you're better off buying. But if you know, and if you're not, if you just really enjoy driving and you want to have a new car, then go ahead and lease. I mean, there's pros and cons to both, to be honest with you, it's not one size fits all.

Shawn: Alright Nina, great. Happy Thanksgiving to you. Alright, Nina Mitchell is with The Colony Group, for more go to wtop.com and search Her Wealth.

Sign up to receive the guide

Consider this your training manual to get and stay financially fit for life!

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form
Nina Mitchell, Principal, Senior Wealth Advisor & Co-President, Colony Sports & Entertainment

With over 25 years of finance, tax and investment advisory experience, Nina advises an elite group of professional athletes, executives and high net worth individuals. She is a driving force behind Her Wealth, Colony's initiative to empower women with financial knowledge, resources and confidence.